History of Drugs: From Ancient Times to Modern Epidemics

Dive into the riveting history of drugs, from ancient practices to modern policies and perspectives.

James Ekbatini
April 29, 2024

Early Drug Use in the US

The history of drugs in the United States traces back to the country's inception, with drugs being used for both medicinal and recreational purposes. A significant shift in the perception and regulation of drugs began in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, which is often linked to the rise of taxation acts and drug laws.

Medicinal and Recreational Beginnings

Contrary to what many might think, drug use was common in the United States long before the 20th century. The use of drugs for medicinal and recreational purposes was widespread, as evidenced by early catalogues such as the popular Sears and Roebuck offering a syringe and small amount of cocaine for $1.50 in the 1890s (History.com). This indicates that drugs were not only widely available but also relatively affordable and accepted in society.

During this period, drugs such as cocaine, opium, and morphine were commonly used by physicians for medical treatments, as well as by individuals for recreational use. However, concerns about the health effects and addiction potential of these substances began to emerge, leading to calls for regulation.

Congressional Taxation Acts

The first significant step towards drug regulation in the United States was made in 1890, when Congress enacted a tax on morphine and opium. This marked the beginning of federal involvement in drug control, as the government sought to limit drug use and curb the growing addiction problem.

In 1909, the federal government passed the Smoking Opium Exclusion Act, which was the first federal law to ban the non-medical use of a substance. This act prohibited the smoking of opium while still allowing it for medicinal use.

However, it was not until 1937 that Congress passed the "Marihuana Tax Act," placing a tax on the sale of cannabis, hemp, or marijuana. This marked a significant shift in drug policy and set the stage for the future War on Drugs.

These early taxation acts and regulatory measures laid the groundwork for the current drug policies in the United States, which have evolved significantly over time. The complex history of drugs in the United States underscores the ongoing challenges in managing drug use and addiction, and highlights the importance of understanding this history in informing future policies.

Evolution of Drug Legislation

The evolution of drug legislation in the United States is a complex and multifaceted story, reflecting changing societal attitudes and understanding of drugs and their effects on individuals and communities. This evolution has been marked by key pieces of legislation, including federal bans, taxation, and the Controlled Substances Act.

Federal Bans and Taxation

One of the first instances of drug legislation in the US was the congressional act of 1890, which imposed taxes on morphine and opium (History.com). This act marked a turning point in the history of drugs, as it was the first time that the federal government had intervened in the drug market.

Following this, in 1909, the Smoking Opium Exclusion Act became the first federal law to ban the non-medical use of a substance. This legislation prohibited the use of opium for smoking but allowed it for medicinal purposes. This was a significant step in the categorization and regulation of drugs, setting a precedent for future legislation (History.com).

Fast forward to 1937, the "Marihuana Tax Act" was passed, placing a tax on the sale of cannabis, hemp, or marijuana. This act further illustrated the government's evolving approach towards controlling the use and distribution of drugs.

Controlled Substances Act

The Controlled Substances Act of 1970 marked a significant milestone in the history of drug legislation. Signed into law by President Richard Nixon, this act classified drugs into five schedules based on their medical application and abuse potential, with Schedule 1 drugs considered the most dangerous (History.com).

Schedule Description
Schedule 1 Drugs with no currently accepted medical use and a high potential for abuse.
Schedule 2 Drugs with a high potential for abuse, with use potentially leading to severe psychological or physical dependence.
Schedule 3 Drugs with a moderate to low potential for physical and psychological dependence.
Schedule 4 Drugs with a low potential for abuse and low risk of dependence.
Schedule 5 Drugs with lower potential for abuse than Schedule 4 and consist of preparations containing limited quantities of certain narcotics.

This legislation provided a legal framework for the regulation and control of drug production, distribution, and use. It also underscored the federal government's commitment to combatting drug abuse and trafficking, setting the stage for future drug policies and initiatives. However, the impact of these policies, particularly on specific communities, would become a contentious issue in the years to come.

Impact of Drug Policies

In the course of the history of drugs, policy changes have played a significant role in shaping societal attitudes and responses to drug use and addiction. These policies have also had significant impacts on various demographic groups, notably in terms of racial disparities.

Reagan's Anti-Drug Policies

One of the key turning points in drug policy was during the 1980s, under President Ronald Reagan. His administration is particularly known for passing the Anti-Drug Abuse Act in 1986, which led to a significant increase in incarcerations for nonviolent drug offenses. This was a pivotal shift in the American approach to addiction, which had previously been seen as a medico-criminal problem with a combination of law enforcement and treatment strategies being used. However, Reagan's policies marked a swing back towards strict law enforcement and punitive measures (NCBI Bookshelf).

These policies have been widely criticized for their racial disparities. African Americans were disproportionately affected, facing higher rates of arrest and incarceration compared to white Americans, despite similar rates of drug use.

Racial Disparities in Incarceration

The racial disparities in drug-related incarcerations have deep roots and can be traced back to earlier periods in the history of drugs. For instance, a noticeable shift occurred in the 1940s and 1950s, when black men became more involved in heroin use, leading to a racial transformation of the addict population. This growing use of heroin by black men in urban areas contributed to the rise of black heroin addiction.

This transformation was noted by officials, as narcotic treatment centers began seeing an increase in black patients. The shift from mostly white patients to mostly black patients was attributed to the changing demographics of drug use.

Time Period Predominant Racial Group Among Addicts
Before 1940s White
1940s-1950s Shift towards Black
Post-1950s Predominantly Black

The racial disparities in drug-related incarcerations and treatment have had profound social and cultural impacts. Understanding these disparities and their historical context is essential for any comprehensive exploration of the history of drugs and addiction. They also underline the need for more equitable drug policies and practices in the future.

History of Addiction

The history of addiction and substance use is as old as humanity itself. Understanding its evolution offers us valuable insights into the complex nature of addiction and how societies have grappled with it over the centuries.

Ancient Substance Use

Our taste for addictive psychoactive substances is attested to in the earliest human records. Psychoactive substances have historically been used by priests in religious ceremonies (eg, amanita muscaria), healers for medicinal purposes (eg, opium), and the general population in a socially approved way (eg, alcohol, nicotine, and caffeine).

Our early ancestors lived as hunter-gatherers and, as shown by the culture of human groups who retained this lifestyle (eg, Australian aborigines, Amazon Indians, or Kalahari desert Bushmen), they undoubtedly collected considerable information on pharmacological plants.

Historically, abnormal patterns of substance use have been documented as far back as the era of Alexander the Great, who died in 323 BC.

Concept of Addiction Emergence

The concept of addiction, as understood today, has evolved over centuries. The issue of loss of control of the substance, heralding today's definition of addiction, was already being discussed in the 17th century.

One crucial understanding that emerged is that addiction is not only about the substance but also about the way a person uses it. In other words, it is not just the drink, but the drinker, that defines addiction (NCBI). This perspective shifted the focus from the substance alone to the relationship between the user and the substance. It marked a fundamental change in how societies approach and understand the complex issue of addiction.

Unraveling the history of drugs and addiction provides a broader perspective on this ongoing global issue. It highlights the complex interplay of societal, cultural, and personal factors that contribute to the development and persistence of addiction, providing crucial context for ongoing debates and strategies for prevention and treatment.

Cultural and Religious Influences

The history of drug use is not only rooted in medicinal and recreational applications, but also deeply entwined with cultural and religious practices. This is particularly evident in ancient civilizations, where substances with psychoactive properties were often used in religious rituals and ceremonies to facilitate communication with the divine.

Ancient Greek Practices

In ancient Greece, substances such as opium and potentially psychoactive plants played a pivotal role in religious rites and rituals. The Eleusinian Mysteries, for instance, involved the consumption of a beverage called kykeon. This concoction was thought to contain a psychoactive ingredient (commonly hypothesized to be ergot), which allowed participants to enter an altered state of mind during the rites to facilitate communication and understanding with the gods (Hellenic Museum).

Evidence of opium use in ancient Greece dates back to around 1300 BCE, with the discovery of a terracotta figure of a 'poppy goddess' in Crete. This, along with other archaeological findings such as a seal ring from Mycenae and juglets resembling opium poppy seeds found on Cyprus, attests to the widespread use of opium in ancient Greek culture. Furthermore, Demeter, a significant figure in the Eleusinian Mysteries, was often depicted holding poppy heads, highlighting the association between sacred elements like poppies and religious rituals in this culture (Hellenic Museum).

Oracle of Delphi

The Oracle of Delphi, a prominent religious figure in ancient Greece, was believed to communicate divine messages after inhaling gas from a fissure in the ground. This led to trance-like states and visions, believed to be the conduit for divine communication. Modern investigations suggest that seismotectonic activity in the area released light gases, which could induce mild euphoria and visions.

These instances from ancient Greece highlight the long-standing relationship between drug use and religious or cultural practices, demonstrating that the use of substances has been a part of human societies for millennia. The history of drugs extends beyond recreational and medicinal use, intertwining with our ancestors' spiritual beliefs and cultural practices, shaping social norms and religious experiences throughout the ages.

Modern Perspectives on Addiction

The modern understanding of addiction has evolved significantly over the years. Today, the subject is explored and analyzed from various angles, including the 'nature vs. nurture' debate and shifts in societal attitudes and policies.

Nature vs. Nurture Debate

One of the significant discussions in the realm of addiction is whether the condition is a result of an individual's genetic makeup (nature) or their environment and experiences (nurture). This debate reflects the complex etiology of addiction, which includes elements of individual vulnerability, substance properties, and social factors (NCBI).

Rather than viewing addiction as purely a substance issue, modern perspectives highlight the importance of the user's behavior. In other words, addiction is not just about the substance, but how a person uses it.

Attempts to understand the nature of illicit drug abuse and addiction have spanned centuries, often limited by the prevailing scientific theories and social attitudes of the time.

Changes in Attitudes and Policies

The perception and handling of addiction have undergone significant changes over the years. Early pioneers of U.S. drug abuse research, like Dr. Benjamin Rush, worked with limited scientific resources and lacked the technology to fully understand the cellular response to drugs.

Over time, however, the expansion of drug abuse research, largely driven by grants from the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) and the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH), has led to a deeper understanding of addiction. This growth in knowledge has in turn influenced attitudes towards illicit drugs and drug users, and shaped drug policies (NCBI Bookshelf).

Modern perspectives on addiction reflect a departure from viewing it solely as a moral failing or sin, to understanding it as a complex disease that requires medical treatment. This shift has prompted the development of various treatment strategies and interventions aimed at managing and overcoming addiction.

In conclusion, the history of drugs and the evolving understanding of addiction provide valuable insights into the complexities of this issue. By continually refining our knowledge and approach, we can better address the challenges posed by addiction and work towards more effective solutions.

References

[1]: https://www.history.com/topics/crime/the-war-on-drugs

[2]: https://www.hellenic.org.au/post/ritual-religious-drug-use-in-ancient-greece

[3]: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3202501/

[4]: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK232965/

[5]: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK234755/